显示标签为“Health”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“Health”的博文。显示所有博文

2011年6月19日星期日

Program Offering Waivers for Health Law Is Ending

No more applications will be accepted after Sept. 22, federal health officials said.


Steven B. Larsen, director of the federal Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight, said employers and labor unions had until that date to seek exemptions or request the extension of waivers already granted.


The new health care law generally requires employers to provide at least $750,000 in coverage to each person in their health insurance plans this year. Many restaurants, retailers and small businesses do not meet the standard. Some provide “mini-med” coverage with annual limits that may be as low as $10,000.


“Mini-med plans do not provide comprehensive health coverage, but unfortunately they are the only insurance options some consumers have today,” Mr. Larsen said.


The minimum amount of coverage will increase. Federal rules require health plans to provide at least $1.25 million in coverage next year and $2 million in 2013. In 2014, annual limits for new health plans will be banned. In that year, individuals and small businesses will be able to buy comprehensive coverage through state-supervised insurance exchanges.


Waivers granted or renewed in the next three months will run through 2013. To date, the administration has granted waivers to 1,433 health plans covering 3.2 million people.


On Friday, the administration disclosed that it had denied 100 applications and then approved nearly one-third of them after reconsidering the evidence.


To obtain waivers, employers and health plans must show that compliance with the federal requirements would cause a significant increase in premiums or a significant decrease in access to benefits. Without waivers, some employers said, they would have increased premiums or dropped coverage this year because they could not afford to provide higher health benefits.


Republicans have seized on the waivers as evidence that the law is fundamentally flawed.


“If the law is so good, why are more and more employers begging for a waiver to get relief from its burdensome mandates?” asked Senator John Barrasso, Republican of Wyoming. “Americans need waivers from the president’s law because it causes health premiums to go up.”


The policy announced Friday may eliminate the waivers as an issue in the 2012 election year. Under the policy, the administration said, employers and insurers with annual coverage limits below $2 million will have “a reasonable opportunity” to apply for waivers in the next three months.


Republicans have repeatedly asserted that the administration was giving preferential treatment to its political allies by granting waivers to health plans sponsored by labor unions that had supported the legislation. But in a study this week, the Government Accountability Office, an investigative arm of Congress, said health officials had used objective criteria in deciding whether to grant waivers.


E. Neil Trautwein, a vice president of the National Retail Federation, a trade group, said that ending the waivers was “a wise, appropriate step for the administration to take.”


“This step will avoid unnecessary politics and furor over the waivers,” Mr. Trautwein said.


View the original article here

2011年6月7日星期二

Personal Health: A Good Night’s Sleep Isn’t a Luxury; It’s a Necessity

But my neglect was costing me in ways that I did not fully appreciate. My husband called our nights at the ballet and theater “Jane’s most expensive naps.” Eventually we relinquished our subscriptions. Driving, too, was dicey: twice I fell asleep at the wheel, narrowly avoiding disaster. I realize now that I was living in a state of chronic sleep deprivation.


I don’t want to nod off during cultural events, and I no longer have my husband to spell me at the wheel. I also don’t want to compromise my ability to think and react. As research cited recently in this newspaper’s magazine found, “The sleep-deprived among us are lousy judges of our own sleep needs. We are not nearly as sharp as we think we are.”


Studies have shown that people function best after seven to eight hours of sleep, so I now aim for a solid seven hours, the amount associated with the lowest mortality rate. Yet on most nights something seems to interfere, keeping me up later than my intended lights-out at 10 p.m. — an essential household task, an e-mail requiring an urgent and thoughtful response, a condolence letter I never found time to write during the day, a long article that I must read.


It’s always something.


What’s Keeping Us Up?


I know I’m hardly alone. Between 1960 and 2010, the average night’s sleep for adults in the United States dropped to six and a half hours from more than eight. Some experts predict a continuing decline, thanks to distractions like e-mail, instant and text messaging, and online shopping.


Age can have a detrimental effect on sleep. In a 2005 national telephone survey of 1,003 adults ages 50 and older, the Gallup Organization found that a mere third of older adults got a good night’s sleep every day, fewer than half slept more than seven hours, and one-fifth slept less than six hours a night.


With advancing age, natural changes in sleep quality occur. People may take longer to fall asleep, and they tend to get sleepy earlier in the evening and to awaken earlier in the morning. More time is spent in the lighter stages of sleep and less in restorative deep sleep. R.E.M. sleep, during which the mind processes emotions and memories and relieves stress, also declines with age.


Habits that ruin sleep often accompany aging: less physical activity, less time spent outdoors (sunlight is the body’s main regulator of sleepiness and wakefulness), poorer attention to diet, taking medications that can disrupt sleep, caring for a chronically ill spouse, having a partner who snores. Some use alcohol in hopes of inducing sleep; in fact, it disrupts sleep.


Add to this list a host of sleep-robbing health issues, like painful arthritis, diabetes, depression, anxiety, sleep apnea, hot flashes in women and prostate enlargement in men. In the last years of his life, my husband was plagued with restless leg syndrome, forcing him to get up and walk around in the middle of the night until the symptoms subsided. During a recent night, I was awake for hours with leg cramps that simply wouldn’t quit.


Beauty Rest and Beyond


A good night’s sleep is much more than a luxury. Its benefits include improvements in concentration, short-term memory, productivity, mood, sensitivity to pain and immune function.


If you care about how you look, more sleep can even make you appear more attractive. In a study published online in December in the journal BMJ, researchers in Sweden and the Netherlands reported that 23 sleep-deprived adults seemed to untrained observers to be less healthy, more tired and less attractive than they appeared to be after a full night’s sleep.


Perhaps more important, losing sleep may make you fat — or at least, fatter than you would otherwise be. In a study by Harvard researchers involving 68,000 middle-aged women followed for 16 years, those who slept five hours or less each night were found to weigh 5.4 pounds more — and were 15 percent more likely to become obese — than the women who slept seven hours nightly.


Michael Breus, a clinical psychologist and sleep specialist in Scottsdale, Ariz., and author of “The Sleep Doctor’s Diet Plan,” points out that as the average length of sleep has declined in the United States, the average weight of Americans has increased.


There are plausible reasons to think this is a cause-and-effect relationship. At least two factors may be involved: more waking hours in homes brimming with food and snacks; and possible changes in the hormones leptin and ghrelin, which regulate appetite.


In a study published in 2009 in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Dr. Plamen D. Penev, an endocrinologist at the University of Chicago, and co-authors explored calorie consumption and expenditure by 11 healthy volunteers who spent two 14-day stays in a sleep laboratory. Both sessions offered unlimited access to tasty foods. During one stay, the volunteers — five women and six men — were limited to 5.5 hours of sleep a night, and during the other they got 8.5 hours of sleep.


Although the subjects ate the same amount of food at meals, during the shortened nights they consumed an average of 221 more calories from snacks than they did when they were getting more sleep. The snacks they ate tended to be high in carbohydrates, and the subjects expended no more energy than they did on the longer nights. In just two weeks, the extra nighttime snacking could add nearly a pound to body weight, the scientists concluded.


These researchers found no significant changes in the participants’ blood levels of the hormones leptin and ghrelin, but others have found that short sleepers have lower levels of appetite-suppressing leptin and higher levels of ghrelin, which prompts an increase in calorie intake.


Sleep loss may also affect the function of a group of neurons in the hypothalamus of the brain, where another hormone, orexin, is involved in the regulation of feeding behavior.


The bottom line: Resist the temptation to squeeze one more thing into the end of your day. If health problems disrupt your sleep, seek treatment that can lessen their effect. If you have trouble falling asleep or often awaken during the night and can’t get back to sleep, you could try taking supplements of melatonin, the body’s natural sleep inducer. I keep it at my bedside.


If you have trouble sleeping, the tips accompanying this article may help. And if all else fails, try to take a nap during the day. Naps can enhance brain function, energy, mood and productivity.


This is the second of two columns on sleep needs.


View the original article here

2011年5月15日星期日

Recipes for Health: Beet Greens, Green Garlic and Barley Gratin

 

1 generous bunch beet greens, stemmed and washed


2 tablespoons extra virgin olive oil


1 medium onion, chopped


4 large cloves green garlic, peeled and sliced, or one small head that has not separated into cloves, chopped


Salt to taste


1 teaspoon fresh thyme leaves or 1/2 teaspoon dried thyme


3 eggs


1/2 cup 2 percent milk


Freshly ground pepper


1 cup cooked barley (regular pearled or purple), brown rice or arborio rice


1/2 cup grated Gruyère cheese (2 ounces)


2 tablespoons freshly grated Parmesan


1. Preheat the oven to 375 degrees. Oil a 2-quart gratin dish with olive oil. Blanch the beet greens for one minute in a large pot of generously salted boiling water, or steam over 1 inch of boiling water for two to five minutes until wilted and tender. Rinse with cold water, squeeze out water and chop medium-fine. Set aside.


2. Heat the oil over medium heat in a large, heavy skillet. Add the onion, and cook, stirring, until tender, about five minutes. Add the garlic and a generous pinch of salt. Continue to cook for another minute or two until the garlic is fragrant. Stir in the cooked greens and the thyme, and toss together. Season to taste with salt and pepper. Remove from the heat.


3. In a large bowl, beat together the eggs and milk. Add 1/2 teaspoon salt and freshly ground pepper to taste. Stir in the greens mixture, the barley or rice, and the cheeses. Mix together well. Scrape into the oiled baking dish.


4. Bake 35 to 40 minutes until sizzling and lightly browned on the top and sides. Remove from the heat, and allow to sit for at least 10 minutes before serving.


Yield: Serves four to six.


Advance preparation: The gratin will be good for three or four days. It is as good served cold or at room temperature as it is hot.


Nutritional information per serving (four servings): 272 calories; 6 grams saturated fat; 2 grams polyunsaturated fat; 8 grams monounsaturated fat; 159 milligrams cholesterol; 19 grams carbohydrates; 4 grams dietary fiber; 282 milligrams sodium (does not include salt to taste); 13 grams protein


Nutritional information per serving (six servings): 181 calories; 4 grams saturated fat; 1 gram polyunsaturated fat; 5 grams monounsaturated fat; 106 milligrams cholesterol; 13 grams carbohydrates; 3 grams dietary fiber; 188 milligrams sodium (does not include salt to taste); 9 grams protein


Martha Rose Shulman is the author of "The Very Best of Recipes for Health."


 

2011年5月14日星期六

Health Insurers Making Record Profits as Many Postpone Care

The UnitedHealth Group, one of the largest commercial insurers, told analysts that so far this year, insured hospital stays actually decreased in some instances. In reporting its earnings last week, Cigna, another insurer, talked about the “low level” of medical use.


Yet the companies continue to press for higher premiums, even though their reserve coffers are flush with profits and shareholders have been rewarded with new dividends. Many defend proposed double-digit increases in the rates they charge, citing a need for protection against any sudden uptick in demand once people have more money to spend on their health, as well as the rising price of care.


Even with a halting economic recovery, doctors and others say many people are still extremely budget-conscious, signaling the possibility of a fundamental change in Americans’ appetite for health care.


“I am noticing my patients with insurance are more interested in costs,” said Dr. Jim King, a family practice physician in rural Tennessee. “Gas prices are going up, food prices are going up. They are deciding to put some of their health care off.” A patient might decide not to drive the 50 miles necessary to see a specialist because of the cost of gas, he said.


But Dr. King said patients were also being more thoughtful about their needs. Fewer are asking for an MRI as soon as they have a bad headache. “People are realizing that this is my money, even if I’m not writing a check,” he said.


For someone like Shannon Hardin of California, whose hours at a grocery store have been erratic, there is simply no spare cash to see the doctor when she isn’t feeling well or to get the $350 dental crowns she has been putting off since last year. Even with insurance, she said, “I can’t afford to use it.” Delaying care could keep utilization rates for insurers low through the rest of the year, according to Charles Boorady, an analyst for Credit Suisse. “The big question is whether it is going to stay weak or bounce back,” he said. “Nobody knows.”


Significant increases in how much people have to pay for their medical care may prevent a solid rebound. In recent years, many employers have sharply reduced benefits, while raising deductibles and co-payments so people have to reach deeper into their pockets.


In 2010, about 10 percent of people covered by their employer had a deductible of at least $2,000, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonprofit research group, compared with just 5 percent of covered workers in 2008.


Doctors, for one, say patients’ attitudes are changing. “Because it’s from Dollar 1 to Dollar 2,000, they are being really conscious of how they spend their money,” said Dr. James Applegate, a family physician in Grand Rapids, Mich. For example, patients question the need for annual blood work.


High deductibles also can be daunting. David Welch, a nurse in California whose policy has a $4,000 deductible, said he was surprised to realize he had delayed going to the dermatologist, even though he had a history of skin cancer. Mr. Welch, who has been a supporter of the need to overhaul insurance industry practices for the California Nurses Association union, said he hoped his medical training would help him determine when to go to the doctor. “I underestimated how much that cost would affect my behavior,” he said.


Dr. Rebecca Jaffe, a family practice doctor in Wilmington, Del., said more patients were asking for the generic alternatives to brand-name medicines, because of hefty co-payments. “Now, all of a sudden, they want the generic, when for years, they said they couldn’t take it,” she said.


The insurers, which base what they charge in premiums largely on what they expect to pay out in future claims, say they still expect higher demand for care later this year. “I think there’s a real concern about a bounce-back, a rebound, in utilization,” said Dr. Lonny Reisman, the chief medical officer for Aetna.


Because they say they expect costs to rebound, insurers have not been shy about asking for higher rates. In Oregon, for example, Regence BlueCross BlueShield, a nonprofit insurer that is the state’s largest, is asking for a 22 percent increase for policies sold to individuals. In California, regulators have been resisting requests from insurers to raise rates by double digits.


Some observers wonder if the insurers are simply raising premiums in advance of the full force of the health care law in 2014. The insurers’ recent prosperity — big insurance companies have reported first-quarter earnings that beat analysts expectations by an average of 30 percent — may make it difficult for anyone, politicians and industry executives alike, to argue that the industry has been hurt by the federal health care law. Insurers were able to raise premiums to cover the cost of the law’s early provisions, like insuring adult children up to age 26, and federal and state regulators have largely proved to be accommodating.


But 2014 and 2015 are likely to be far more challenging, as insurers are forced to adjust to the law’s greatest changes, like providing coverage to everyone regardless of whether they have an expensive pre-existing condition. “I think they’re going to go through a winter,” said Paul H. Keckley, executive director of the?Deloitte Center for Health Solutions, a research unit of the consulting firm Deloitte.


And while the slowing down of demand is good for insurers, at least in the short term, the concern is that patients may be tempted to skip important tests like colonoscopies or mammograms. The new health care law will eventually prevent most policies from charging patients for certain kinds of preventive care, but some plans still require someone to pay $500 toward a colonoscopy.


In recent times, insurers have prospered by pricing policies above costs, said Robert Laszewski, a former health insurance executive who is now a consultant in Alexandria, Va. The industry goes through underwriting cycles where the companies are better able to predict costs and make room for profits. “They’re benefiting from a very positive underwriting cycle,” he said.


“Maybe managed care is finally working,” he said. “Maybe this is the new normal.”


Still, he emphasized, health care costs, even if they are rising at 6 percent or 7 percent a year, are increasing at a much faster pace than overall inflation. “We haven’t solved the problem,” Mr. Laszewski said.


 

The Health Consumer: Speed Bumps on the Way to an A.D.H.D. Diagnosis

In school, she would procrastinate and then pull desperate all-nighters to study for an exam. She’d become hyperfocused on a project and let everything else fall by the wayside. Maintaining relationships was tricky. “I would concentrate intensely on a friend and then move on,” she said. She commuted to college one year simply because she had missed the deadline to apply for housing.


“I managed to achieve a lot, but it was difficult,” said Ms. Goldberg, a mother of three who lives near Philadelphia. “I sensed something was wrong, but others would always talk me out of it.”


Finally, in her late 40s, Ms. Goldberg was given a diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, a condition caused by signaling problems in the brain. The primary symptoms are impulsiveness, inattention, restlessness and poor self-regulation. Children with the condition tend to be hyperactive, but adults who have it often just seem distracted and disorganized.


Undiagnosed, A.D.H.D. can wreak havoc on relationships, finances and one’s self-esteem. Adults with the disorder are twice as likely as those without it to be divorced, for instance, and four times as likely to have car accidents. It’s no surprise that they also tend to have poor credit ratings.


“A.D.H.D. is a very debilitating mental disorder,” said Russell Barkley, a clinical professor of psychiatry at the Medical University of South Carolina. “It can produce more severe impairment, and in more domains of life, than depression or anxiety.”


More than 5 percent of adults have A.D.H.D., according to a recent study by Dr. Barkley. But just 10 percent of those adults have a formal diagnosis.


It’s an expensive problem for many consumers. Adults with the condition, particularly women, are frequently given a diagnosis of depression, anxiety or bipolar disorder instead — or their symptoms are dismissed, as Ms. Goldberg’s were.


Ms. Goldberg said of her eventual diagnosis: “It was so freeing. I realized, ‘I’m not stupid — I have a mental disorder.’?”


Just getting the correct diagnosis can be costly. “Many clinicians do not know how to spot the signs,” said Ari Tuckman, a psychologist in West Chester, Pa., and author of a book about A.D.H.D., “More Attention, Less Deficit” (Specialty Press, 2009).


Clinicians may arrive at the diagnosis with a snap judgment, or they may send patients for lengthy and expensive neuropsychological evaluations. Both approaches tend to miss the main symptoms — and therefore waste the patient’s time and money.


If you think that you may have A.D.H.D., or that a friend or family member may, the first thing to do is get a proper diagnosis. Here’s how to get tested and what to avoid.


Step 1: Test yourself.


Cost: Free.


If you’re not quite sure if you or a family member has the disorder, start by printing out the Adult A.D.H.D. Self-Report Scale and answering the 18-question assessment. It was developed by a team of psychiatrists in conjunction with the World Health Organization, and it is used by many clinicians to diagnose A.D.H.D.


The test is simple and has a straightforward scoring system. Use the results only as a guide to gauge your symptoms or a family member’s; it should not serve as a final diagnosis.


Bear in mind that A.D.H.D. is not something you suddenly develop as an adult; you are born with it. “If you tell me, ‘My life was fine until I was 24,’ you don’t have this disorder,” said Dr. Barkley.


Avoid: Snap diagnoses.


Diagnosing this disorder takes time. A quick assessment, even by your favorite doctor or therapist, can miss important signs.


“I can’t guess how many clients I have had who have seen other psychologists, psychiatrists and primary care physicians who missed their A.D.H.D., even though it was burning like a bonfire,” said Dr. Tuckman. “It’s possible to make a diagnosis by using a rating scale and a 10-minute discussion, but it’s also far too easy to make an inaccurate diagnosis or miss a diagnosis.”


Step 2: Find an experienced clinician.


Cost: $200 to $500.


Make an appointment, or more than one, with a psychiatrist, psychologist or neurologist who has expertise in diagnosing A.D.H.D. Ask your doctor or a psychotherapist for a recommendation, or contact a local chapter of the organization Children and Adults With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (informally known as Chadd) and inquire about local professionals.


Dr. Barkley also suggests calling a nearby medical school or university psychiatry program and asking whether there is a doctor on staff who specializes in adult A.D.H.D.


 

2011年5月10日星期二

Battle Over Health Care Law Shifts to Federal Appellate Courts

At Tuesday’s hearing, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit will consider a pair of contradictory rulings sent up from the lower courts. In one case, filed by Virginia’s attorney general, a federal district judge in Richmond ruled late last year that Congress had exceeded its authority by requiring most Americans to obtain health insurance. In the other, filed by Liberty University, a conservative Christian institution, a district judge sitting 100 miles away in Lynchburg, Va., upheld the insurance mandate.


If the appellate courts act quickly, the question of the health law’s constitutionality could land before the Supreme Court as soon as the next term, which opens in October.


With the lower courts divided, each side hopes to build a string of victories in the midlevel Courts of Appeals.


“We want to win as many of these as we can,” said Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II of Virginia, a Republican. “If we have nothing but wins all the way up to the Supreme Court, there is an element of momentum, I think, where the justices consider what has gone on before the case came to them.”


Since the enactment of the Affordable Care Act in March 2010, 31 lawsuits have been filed to challenge it, according to the Justice Department, which is defending the Obama administration. Nine are awaiting action by Courts of Appeals, and nine are pending in federal district courts. The others have been dismissed.


Three district judges appointed by Democratic presidents have upheld the law while two Republican appointees have struck down part or all of it.


On June 1, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati is scheduled to hear the appeal of a ruling in favor of the law. On June 8, the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Atlanta will review a Florida judge’s ruling that invalidated the entire act. That judge later suspended his own order until higher courts could settle the matter.


The Supreme Court recently turned down a request by Mr. Cuccinelli that it hear the case without review by the Court of Appeals.


In Tuesday’s hearing, a three-judge panel will first hear arguments in the case filed by Liberty University and then in the one filed by Mr. Cuccinelli. The makeup of the randomly selected panel will not be revealed until Tuesday morning.


With the addition of four appointees by President Obama, the Fourth Circuit bench now includes seven members named by Democratic presidents and seven named by Republicans. The loser before the three-judge panel may petition for a hearing before the entire court before taking the case to the Supreme Court.


The Obama administration will be represented in each of the appellate cases by Neal K. Katyal, the acting solicitor general.


Solicitors general more typically argue for the federal government before the Supreme Court. Although it is not unprecedented for them to appear before Courts of Appeals, Mr. Katyal’s assignment is seen as a nod to the significance of the case.


E. Duncan Getchell Jr., Virginia’s solicitor general, will speak for the commonwealth, as he did in the district court, and Liberty University will be represented by Mathew D. Staver, the dean of its law school.


The plaintiffs in the 11th Circuit case, including Republican officials from 26 states, will be represented by Paul D. Clement, a United States solicitor general under President George W. Bush. Mr. Clement recently resigned from King & Spalding after it withdrew its support for his defense of a federal law banning recognition of same-sex marriages.


Scores of politicians, economists and interest groups have filed friend-of-the-court briefs on both sides of the health care litigation.


The Virginia and Liberty University cases bear some differences. But both challenge the insurance requirement on the ground that it cannot be supported by the commerce clause of the United States Constitution, which gives Congress broad but not unlimited authority to regulate interstate commerce. Starting in 2014, the health care law would require most Americans to obtain policies or pay an income tax penalty.


The plaintiffs complain that the government has never before forced citizens to buy a commercial product. In the lower courts, arguments have centered on whether a choice to not buy insurance constitutes the kind of economic “activity” that the Supreme Court has, in the past, found subject to federal regulation.


The judges are also being asked to determine whether Virginia has legal standing to challenge the law, whether the insurance requirement can be supported under Congress’s authority to tax, whether it runs afoul of religious liberties, whether employers can be required to contribute to their workers’ health coverage, and whether a finding against one provision of the law should invalidate the entire act.


 

2011年5月9日星期一

Battle Over Health Care Law Shifts to Federal Appellate Courts

 

At Tuesday’s hearing, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit will consider a pair of contradictory rulings sent up from the lower courts. In one case, filed by Virginia’s attorney general, a federal district judge in Richmond ruled late last year that Congress had exceeded its authority by requiring most Americans to obtain health insurance. In the other, filed by Liberty University, a conservative Christian institution, a district judge sitting 100 miles away in Lynchburg, Va., upheld the insurance mandate.


If the appellate courts act quickly, the question of the health law’s constitutionality could land before the Supreme Court as soon as the next term, which opens in October.


With the lower courts divided, each side hopes to build a string of victories in the midlevel Courts of Appeals.


“We want to win as many of these as we can,” said Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II of Virginia, a Republican. “If we have nothing but wins all the way up to the Supreme Court, there is an element of momentum, I think, where the justices consider what has gone on before the case came to them.”


Since the enactment of the Affordable Care Act in March 2010, 31 lawsuits have been filed to challenge it, according to the Justice Department, which is defending the Obama administration. Nine are awaiting action by Courts of Appeals, and nine are pending in federal district courts. The others have been dismissed.


Three district judges appointed by Democratic presidents have upheld the law while two Republican appointees have struck down part or all of it.


On June 1, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Cincinnati is scheduled to hear the appeal of a ruling in favor of the law. On June 8, the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Atlanta will review a Florida judge’s ruling that invalidated the entire act. That judge later suspended his own order until higher courts could settle the matter.


The Supreme Court recently turned down a request by Mr. Cuccinelli that it hear the case without review by the Court of Appeals.


In Tuesday’s hearing, a three-judge panel will first hear arguments in the case filed by Liberty University and then in the one filed by Mr. Cuccinelli. The makeup of the randomly selected panel will not be revealed until Tuesday morning.


With the addition of four appointees by President Obama, the Fourth Circuit bench now includes seven members named by Democratic presidents and seven named by Republicans. The loser before the three-judge panel may petition for a hearing before the entire court before taking the case to the Supreme Court.


The Obama administration will be represented in each of the appellate cases by Neal K. Katyal, the acting solicitor general.


Solicitors general more typically argue for the federal government before the Supreme Court. Although it is not unprecedented for them to appear before Courts of Appeals, Mr. Katyal’s assignment is seen as a nod to the significance of the case.


E. Duncan Getchell Jr., Virginia’s solicitor general, will speak for the commonwealth, as he did in the district court, and Liberty University will be represented by Mathew D. Staver, the dean of its law school.


The plaintiffs in the 11th Circuit case, including Republican officials from 26 states, will be represented by Paul D. Clement, a United States solicitor general under President George W. Bush. Mr. Clement recently resigned from King & Spalding after it withdrew its support for his defense of a federal law banning recognition of same-sex marriages.


Scores of politicians, economists and interest groups have filed friend-of-the-court briefs on both sides of the health care litigation.


The Virginia and Liberty University cases bear some differences. But both challenge the insurance requirement on the ground that it cannot be supported by the commerce clause of the United States Constitution, which gives Congress broad but not unlimited authority to regulate interstate commerce. Starting in 2014, the health care law would require most Americans to obtain policies or pay an income tax penalty.


The plaintiffs complain that the government has never before forced citizens to buy a commercial product. In the lower courts, arguments have centered on whether a choice to not buy insurance constitutes the kind of economic “activity” that the Supreme Court has, in the past, found subject to federal regulation.


The judges are also being asked to determine whether Virginia has legal standing to challenge the law, whether the insurance requirement can be supported under Congress’s authority to tax, whether it runs afoul of religious liberties, whether employers can be required to contribute to their workers’ health coverage, and whether a finding against one provision of the law should invalidate the entire act.


 

2011年5月6日星期五

Recipes for Health: Gluten-Free Rice and Millet Flour Crackers

1 3/4 cups rice flour (preferably brown rice flour)


3/4 cup plus 2 tablespoons millet flour (I make mine by grinding millet in a spice mill)


3/4 teaspoon salt


1 teaspoon sugar


1/4 cup water


2 large eggs


2 tablespoons unsalted butter, cut into 1/4-inch pieces


2 tablespoons extra virgin olive oil (or omit the butter and use 1/4 cup olive oil)


2 tablespoons seeds, like as sesame, charnushka (nigella) or poppy seeds


1. Preheat the oven to 375 degrees. Line two baking sheets with parchment. Combine the flours, salt and sugar in the bowl of a food processor fitted with a steel blade. Pulse a few times to combine. Add the butter, and pulse until the flour mixture is crumbly. Combine the water, eggs and olive oil in a measuring cup. Turn on the processor. Add the liquids with the machine running, and process until the dough comes together. The dough will be soft. If it seems wet, add another tablespoon or two of rice flour.


2. Remove from the food processor. Divide into two portions, and roll out each portion into thin sheets. Sprinkle on the seeds. Using the rolling pin, gently press the topping into the surface of the dough. Cut the dough into squares or rectangles, and transfer to the baking sheets.


3. Bake 15 minutes or until lightly browned and crisp.


Yield: Eighty to 90 crackers.


Advance preparation: These crackers will keep for about a week in an airtight container.


Nutritional information per cracker: 26 calories; 0 grams saturated fat; 1 gram polyunsaturated fat; 1 gram monounsaturated fat; 0 milligrams cholesterol; 2 grams carbohydrates; 1 gram dietary fiber; 25 milligrams sodium; 1 gram protein


Martha Rose Shulman is the author of "The Very Best of Recipes for Health."


 

Personal Health: A Thief That Robs the Brain of Language

 

The neurologist he consulted thought Mr. Riedner had suffered a stroke and for three years treated him with cholesterol-lowering medication. But instead of his language ability stabilizing or improving, as should happen following a stroke, it got worse.


A second neurologist concluded after further testing that Mr. Riedner might have a condition called primary progressive aphasia, or P.P.A., a form of dementia affecting the brain’s language center.


Having seen only one other case in his career, the neurologist referred Mr. Riedner and his wife, Mary Beth, to the Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease Center at Northwestern University, whose director, Dr. M. Marsel Mesulam, is perhaps the world’s leading expert on this relatively rare disorder.


P.P.A. is a clinical syndrome, one of several forms of brain disease lost in the medical shadow of their much better known relative Alzheimer’s disease. While hardly as common as Alzheimer’s, P.P.A. is often misdiagnosed, and many patients like Mr. Riedner lose valuable time trying inappropriate and ineffective treatments. Though there is no cure, patients and families can learn ways to minimize the disabilities it causes.


Unlike Alzheimer’s, P.P.A. does not affect memory, at least not initially. It also tends to occur at younger ages, often in the late 50s, and affects twice as many men as women. While symptoms of Alzheimer’s are readily recognized by friends and relatives but not those affected, people with P.P.A. are painfully aware of their struggle to communicate, often long before it is apparent to others.


“Early symptoms are usually very subtle, and patients may be the only ones aware of the problem because they have to work harder to communicate, even though they may not make obvious errors,” said Joseph R. Duffy, head of speech pathology at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. “Initially, their communicative errors are like those we all make and may be written off as due to chronic fatigue. But gradually the errors of speech occur with increasing frequency.”


‘Like Being a Parent Again’


The disorder is also commonly misdiagnosed, usually as Alzheimer’s disease or a result of depression or anxiety, Dr. Duffy said in an interview. But while a definitive diagnosis can be made only at autopsy, the results of neuropsychological testing and the patient’s progressive difficulty with communication despite a normal memory can pinpoint P.P.A. as the problem.


As the condition worsens, cognitive difficulties may become apparent. Now seven years into the disorder, Mr. Riedner is having increasing problems performing the tasks of daily living.


“He can no longer punch in the numbers to operate the garage door or the microwave or the remote for the TV,” Mrs. Riedner, his wife of 38 years, said in an interview. “He might open the car window, then not know how to close it. We bought him an iPad, but he can’t learn how to use it.”


New ways of communicating have to be learned, like using gestures or making lists of things to say or do or eat, so that the person can point to them when needed. Unfortunately, sign language doesn’t work because it, too, depends on the region of the brain that is diseased.


“In some ways it’s like being a parent again. He acts in childlike ways sometimes, but he still wants to be himself, an independent adult,” Mrs. Riedner said. “Coping with the problem takes an immense amount of patience on both our parts.”


Mrs. Riedner said the center at Northwestern has been “a lifesaver for us,” a source of support, speech therapy and rehabilitation, help with practical matters like applying for Social Security disability insurance, and tips on how to minimize the inevitable frustrations that can accompany lost language skills.


Dr. Mesulam was the first in modern times to recognize the distinction between P.P.A. and other forms of dementia.


In 1975, as a newly minted neurologist at Beth Israel Hospital in Boston, he became puzzled by a group of patients who seemed to know what they wanted to say but couldn’t string words together in an intelligible sequence. Their communicative problems got progressively worse, although there were no lesions apparent in their brains.


His report in 1982 on six such cases stimulated modern interest in P.P.A. As Dr. Mesulam explained in a retrospective article in the journal Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders in the fall of 2007, “The aphasia can interfere with word-finding, object naming, syntax, phonology, morphology, spelling or word comprehension. The progression occurs in the course of years rather than months, and the primary nature of the aphasia is demonstrated by showing that memory for recent events, recognition of familiar faces and objects, reasoning, and basic aspects of comportment are relatively preserved at the initial stages.”


Focus on What Remains


With no therapy available to treat the underlying disease, treatment involves determining which aspects of language are strongest, then providing speech therapy that emphasizes those areas and avoids areas in which patients are weakest, Dr. Mesulam said.


Dr. Duffy said that early intervention is important and should focus on alternative approaches to communication like using a computer, picture icons, or iPhones or iPads that have apps that can talk for a person. Family members are taught how to aid comprehension by communicating simply and clearly: telling patients only one thing at a time, reducing noise and other distractions, and avoiding multitasking.


Family members are also taught coping skills and helped to prepare for the future as the disease progresses, said Darby Morhardt, a social worker at the Northwestern center. “There’s inevitably a grieving process as patients change right before their eyes, but at the same time families want to grasp as much as possible of what remains.”


Patients often are encouraged to develop new hobbies and skills that don’t rely on communication, like woodworking, gardening, fishing, sculpting or painting. Among Northwestern’s patients is one who began breeding pigeons and another who started judging dog races.


Unfortunately, if patients live long enough, other deficits — including those involving memory and cognitive abilities, and motor problems resembling symptoms of Parkinson’s disease — often become apparent, as is now happening to Mr. Riedner.


Like Alzheimer’s disease, P.P.A. shortens life expectancy: The average age of death is 67. Ms. Morhardt said it’s important for patients and their families not to delay getting financial matters in order. Many would be wise to consult a lawyer who specializes in elder law, she said.


This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:


Correction: May 5, 2011


The Personal Health column on Tuesday, about primary progressive aphasia, a type of dementia that affects the brain’s language center, misspelled the hometown of Steve Riedner, who struggled with symptoms for years before the disease was correctly diagnosed. It is Schaumburg, Ill., not Schaumberg.


 

2011年4月29日星期五

Recipes for Health: Shrimp and Mango Tacos

2 tablespoons canola oil


1 pound medium or small shrimp, peeled and deveined


2 garlic cloves, sliced


2 teaspoons cumin seeds, lightly toasted and ground


2 Serrano or bird chilies, or 1 large jalape?o, minced


1 large mango, peeled, seeded and finely chopped


1/4 cup chopped cilantro


4 to 5 tablespoons lime juice


8 corn tortillas


1. Heat a large, heavy skillet or wok over medium-high heat, and add the canola oil. When the oil is hot, add the shrimp, salt to taste and the garlic. Sauté, stirring or shaking the pan, until the shrimp begins to color, about two minutes. Add the cumin, and continue to cook until the shrimp is pink and opaque, about three minutes. Add the chilies, mango and cilantro, and stir together for one minute. Stir in the lime juice, and remove from the heat. Taste and adjust seasonings.


2. Wrap the tortillas in a heavy kitchen towel, and place in a steamer basket over 1 inch of boiling water. Cover the pot, and steam for one minute. Turn off the heat, and allow to sit for 15 minutes without uncovering. Alternatively, wrap the tortillas in a towel, and heat in the microwave for one minute.


Warm the shrimp briefly in the pan. Place 2 tortillas on each plate, top with the shrimp, fold over the tortillas and serve with rice.


Yield: Serves four.


Advance preparation: This is best served right after you cook the shrimp and mango.


Nutritional information per serving: 268 calories; 1 gram saturated fat; 3 grams polyunsaturated fat; 5 grams monounsaturated fat; 159 milligrams cholesterol; 28 grams carbohydrates; 3 grams dietary fiber; 763 milligrams sodium; 1 gram protein


 

2011年4月28日星期四

Personal Health: Thyroid Fears Aside, That X-Ray’s Worth It

So I was not surprised by a stream of panicked e-mails I received after a television show in which the popular Dr. Mehmet Oz called thyroid cancer “the fastest-growing cancer in women” and cited the harmful effects of radiation from sources like dental X-rays and mammograms.


Dr. Oz warned that people who have more than five X-rays a year have a fourfold greater risk of developing this cancer, and recommended the use of a lead thyroid shield when getting dental X-rays or mammograms. One of his guests on the program, Dr. Carolyn Runowicz, a gynecological cancer specialist, said she would not get dental X-rays if the only reason was to check her teeth.


Thyroid cancer is much on people’s minds, particularly because of the nuclear reactor accident in Japan. After all, it has only two known causes: a rare genetic condition and exposure to large doses of radiation, especially during childhood.


The effects of radiation are cumulative, so in theory frequent exposure to even low doses could add up to a cancer risk. So what are the facts about radiation and the thyroid, and how concerned should you be about an annual mammogram or dental X-rays every few years?


Here are a few things to remember:


?Thyroid cancer is relatively rare, accounting for about 3 percent of all cancers in women, 1 percent in men and 1.4 percent in children.


?Diagnoses of thyroid cancer have increased sharply in recent decades. Between 1980 and 2007, the incidence rose to 17 per 100,000 from 6 per 100,000 each year, and to 5.8 per 100,000 from 2.5 per 100,000 men each year. The number of diagnoses in women nearly doubled from 2000 to 2008.


?Yet the death rate from this disease has not increased, and more than 97 percent of patients survive.


Dr. Otis W. Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, said the stable death rate despite a rising incidence strongly suggests that most of the thyroid cancers now being diagnosed would never have become a health threat.


“Our technology has gotten so good that we are finding cancers today that even 15 years ago would not have been diagnosed,” Dr. Brawley said in an interview. “We’re finding and treating cancers that would never have killed anyone.”


Advances in Diagnostics


In a study describing a 140 percent increase in thyroid cancers diagnoses from 1973 to 2002, published in The Journal of the American Medical Association in 2006, researchers at the Veterans Affairs medical center in White River Junction, Vt., also concluded that the rise was the result of “increased diagnostic scrutiny.”


They noted that if there were a true increase in thyroid cancer, the rise would be reflected in patients at every stage of the disease. But in their study, 87 percent of the increase was attributable to diagnoses of small papillary thyroid cancers, many of which would never have caused any problem.


The fact that thyroid cancer increased in all age groups from 2000 to 2008, Dr. Brawley said, “is more consistent with the introduction of new diagnostic technology than with any cause like mammography.” If mammography were a factor in the rise of thyroid cancer, he added, you’d expect to see a greater rise in women older than 50 than in women ages 20 to 40.


Dr. Leonard Wartofsky, a thyroid cancer specialist at Washington Hospital Center in the District of Columbia, said in an interview, “The doses associated with mammography have been well studied and well calibrated. As long as it is done with modern equipment, women should not be concerned. That degree of radiation is not consequential.”


The higher rates of thyroid cancer found in women could also reflect the fact that many are checked annually by gynecologists, who routinely examine the thyroid region for possible enlargement, Dr. Brawley suggested.


With regard to dental X-rays, he noted that the amount of radiation exposure associated with them has decreased considerably in the last 20 years, which is inconsistent with a rise in thyroid cancer diagnoses.


Radiation Risks


To be sure, exposure to high doses of radiation, especially in childhood, raises the risk of cancer, and thyroid cancer in particular. Well before this risk was recognized, radiation was widely used to treat benign conditions like enlarged tonsils and adenoids, acne and ringworm of the scalp.


Thyroid cancers afflicted many who were exposed as children, or even prenatally, to large amounts of radiation when Americans dropped atomic bombs in Japan in 1945 and when the Chernobyl accident occurred in 1986.


While very large doses of radiation destroy the thyroid, moderately high doses — like those that are used to treat Hodgkin’s disease or tumors of the head and neck — can cause genetic mutations that develop into cancer.


But what of lower doses? Studies of the relationship between frequent dental X-rays and thyroid cancer have been conflicting, and in some the methodology has been suspect. (Some reports, including a frightening one from Kuwait, relied on people’s ability to remember the X-rays they received.)


But the best study of diagnostic X-ray exams, conducted in Sweden, where precise medical records are kept, found no connection to thyroid cancer.


Other factors linked to an increased risk of thyroid cancer include consumption of nitrates in public water supplies (from fertilizer runoff) and certain vegetables, and goiter caused by insufficient iodine in the diet.


Playing It Safe


There’s no harm in asking a mammographer to use a lead thyroid collar, and a lead apron should cover the front of the neck during dental X-rays. Still, some internal radiation scatter will occur, Dr. Brawley said.


Dr. Wartofsky suggested that women worried about the radiation from a mammogram could have an M.R.I. or ultrasound exam instead. But check first on insurance coverage for these alternatives.


For dental checkups, find a dentist who uses digital X-rays, which deliver much less radiation. “We’ve said for years that the amount of radiation from dental X-rays is not enough to cause cancer,” Dr. Wartofsky said.


And don’t let irrational fear get the better of you: It is simply not possible to detect all dental decay without X-rays, and missing hidden decay could result in the need for a root canal or extraction of the tooth.


 

2011年4月27日星期三

Recipes for Health: Mango, Orange and Ginger Smoothie

1 cup orange juice


1/2 large mango


1 1/4 teaspoons ginger juice (see note below)


4 ice cubes


Optional: 1/2 ripe banana (about 2 ounces peeled banana)


1. Combine the orange juice, mango, ginger juice and ice cubes in a blender. Blend until frothy and smooth. If you want a thicker drink, add the banana. Serve right away for the best flavor.


Note: To make the ginger juice, grate about 2 teaspoons ginger. Place on a piece of cheesecloth. Gather together the edges of the cheesecloth, hold over a bowl and twist to squeeze out the juice.


Yield: One large serving or two small servings.


Advance preparation: This is best served right away.


Nutritional information per serving: 201 calories; 0 grams saturated fat; 0 grams polyunsaturated fat; 0 grams monounsaturated fat; 0 milligrams cholesterol; 48 grams carbohydrates; 3 grams dietary fiber; 4 milligrams sodium; 3 grams protein


Martha Rose Shulman is the author of "The Very Best of Recipes for Health."


 

Personal Health: Thyroid Fears Aside, That X-Ray’s Worth It

So I was not surprised by a stream of panicked e-mails I received after a television show in which the popular Dr. Mehmet Oz called thyroid cancer “the fastest-growing cancer in women” and cited the harmful effects of radiation from sources like dental X-rays and mammograms.


Dr. Oz warned that people who have more than five X-rays a year have a fourfold greater risk of developing this cancer, and recommended the use of a lead thyroid shield when getting dental X-rays or mammograms. One of his guests on the program, Dr. Carolyn Runowicz, a gynecological cancer specialist, said she would not get dental X-rays if the only reason was to check her teeth.


Thyroid cancer is much on people’s minds, particularly because of the nuclear reactor accident in Japan. After all, it has only two known causes: a rare genetic condition and exposure to large doses of radiation, especially during childhood.


The effects of radiation are cumulative, so in theory frequent exposure to even low doses could add up to a cancer risk. So what are the facts about radiation and the thyroid, and how concerned should you be about an annual mammogram or dental X-rays every few years?


Here are a few things to remember:


?Thyroid cancer is relatively rare, accounting for about 3 percent of all cancers in women, 1 percent in men and 1.4 percent in children.


?Diagnoses of thyroid cancer have increased sharply in recent decades. Between 1980 and 2007, the incidence rose to 17 per 100,000 from 6 per 100,000 each year, and to 5.8 per 100,000 from 2.5 per 100,000 men each year. The number of diagnoses in women nearly doubled from 2000 to 2008.


?Yet the death rate from this disease has not increased, and more than 97 percent of patients survive.


Dr. Otis W. Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, said the stable death rate despite a rising incidence strongly suggests that most of the thyroid cancers now being diagnosed would never have become a health threat.


“Our technology has gotten so good that we are finding cancers today that even 15 years ago would not have been diagnosed,” Dr. Brawley said in an interview. “We’re finding and treating cancers that would never have killed anyone.”


Advances in Diagnostics


In a study describing a 140 percent increase in thyroid cancers diagnoses from 1973 to 2002, published in The Journal of the American Medical Association in 2006, researchers at the Veterans Affairs medical center in White River Junction, Vt., also concluded that the rise was the result of “increased diagnostic scrutiny.”


They noted that if there were a true increase in thyroid cancer, the rise would be reflected in patients at every stage of the disease. But in their study, 87 percent of the increase was attributable to diagnoses of small papillary thyroid cancers, many of which would never have caused any problem.


The fact that thyroid cancer increased in all age groups from 2000 to 2008, Dr. Brawley said, “is more consistent with the introduction of new diagnostic technology than with any cause like mammography.” If mammography were a factor in the rise of thyroid cancer, he added, you’d expect to see a greater rise in women older than 50 than in women ages 20 to 40.


Dr. Leonard Wartofsky, a thyroid cancer specialist at Washington Hospital Center in the District of Columbia, said in an interview, “The doses associated with mammography have been well studied and well calibrated. As long as it is done with modern equipment, women should not be concerned. That degree of radiation is not consequential.”


The higher rates of thyroid cancer found in women could also reflect the fact that many are checked annually by gynecologists, who routinely examine the thyroid region for possible enlargement, Dr. Brawley suggested.


With regard to dental X-rays, he noted that the amount of radiation exposure associated with them has decreased considerably in the last 20 years, which is inconsistent with a rise in thyroid cancer diagnoses.


Radiation Risks


To be sure, exposure to high doses of radiation, especially in childhood, raises the risk of cancer, and thyroid cancer in particular. Well before this risk was recognized, radiation was widely used to treat benign conditions like enlarged tonsils and adenoids, acne and ringworm of the scalp.


Thyroid cancers afflicted many who were exposed as children, or even prenatally, to large amounts of radiation when Americans dropped atomic bombs in Japan in 1945 and when the Chernobyl accident occurred in 1986.


While very large doses of radiation destroy the thyroid, moderately high doses — like those that are used to treat Hodgkin’s disease or tumors of the head and neck — can cause genetic mutations that develop into cancer.


But what of lower doses? Studies of the relationship between frequent dental X-rays and thyroid cancer have been conflicting, and in some the methodology has been suspect. (Some reports, including a frightening one from Kuwait, relied on people’s ability to remember the X-rays they received.)


But the best study of diagnostic X-ray exams, conducted in Sweden, where precise medical records are kept, found no connection to thyroid cancer.


Other factors linked to an increased risk of thyroid cancer include consumption of nitrates in public water supplies (from fertilizer runoff) and certain vegetables, and goiter caused by insufficient iodine in the diet.


Playing It Safe


There’s no harm in asking a mammographer to use a lead thyroid collar, and a lead apron should cover the front of the neck during dental X-rays. Still, some internal radiation scatter will occur, Dr. Brawley said.


Dr. Wartofsky suggested that women worried about the radiation from a mammogram could have an M.R.I. or ultrasound exam instead. But check first on insurance coverage for these alternatives.


For dental checkups, find a dentist who uses digital X-rays, which deliver much less radiation. “We’ve said for years that the amount of radiation from dental X-rays is not enough to cause cancer,” Dr. Wartofsky said.


And don’t let irrational fear get the better of you: It is simply not possible to detect all dental decay without X-rays, and missing hidden decay could result in the need for a root canal or extraction of the tooth.


 

2011年4月25日星期一

Recipes for Health: Ribollita

 

6 ounces (1 scant cup) white or borlotti beans, soaked, if desired, for four hours and then drained


1 onion, cut in half


3 large garlic cloves, 1 crushed, the rest minced


Salt to taste


3 tablespoons extra virgin olive oil


1 large carrot, diced


1 celery rib, diced


Pinch of red chili flakes


1/4 Savoy or green cabbage, cored and shredded (2 cups shredded)


1 14-ounce can chopped or puréed tomatoes, with juice


3/4 pound (1 bunch) Swiss chard, kale or a mixture, stemmed, cleaned and chopped or cut in chiffonade (3 cups chopped greens)


A bouquet garni made with a bay leaf, a few sprigs each thyme and parsley, and a Parmesan rind


6 thick slices country bread, preferably whole-grain (about 6 ounces)


1. Place the beans in a medium saucepan, and add 4 cups water, the halved onion and crushed garlic clove. Bring to a boil. Reduce the heat, add salt to taste, cover and simmer 1 hour. Remove the onion halves. Taste and adjust seasonings.


2. Heat 2 tablespoons of the oil in a heavy soup pot, and add the chopped onion, carrots and celery. Cook, stirring often, until the onion is tender, about five minutes. Add the garlic and chili flakes, and stir together for 30 seconds to a minute until fragrant. Add the cabbage. Cook, stirring, until the cabbage wilts, three to five minutes. Add the tomatoes. Cook, stirring, until the tomatoes cook down and smell fragrant, five to 10 minutes. Season to taste with salt.


3. Stir in the beans and their liquid, add the bouquet garni and another 2 cups of water, and bring to a boil. Reduce the heat, cover and simmer 30 minutes or until the beans are tender. Taste and adjust seasonings. Add the greens, raise the heat and simmer covered for another 15 minutes. The greens should be falling apart in the soup. Remove the bouquet garni.


4. Meanwhile, preheat the oven to 300 degrees. Place the bread on the rack, and toast until dry but not browned, about 15 to 20 minutes. Break up into pieces. Remove about 1 cup of the beans and vegetables from the soup. Bring the remaining soup to a simmer, and add the bread. Submerge in the soup, and remove the soup from the heat. Let stand for 20 minutes until the bread is soft. Blend, using a hand immersion blender or the pulse action of a food processor. Return to the pot, add the beans and vegetables you set aside, and heat through. The ribollita should have the consistency of oatmeal. Dilute with water as necessary. Taste and adjust salt and pepper. Spoon the ribollita into bowls or onto soup plates, drizzle olive oil over each bowl and serve.


Note: You can make ribollita with 5 to 6 cups of any type of leftover minestrone using the bread proportions above.


Yield: Serves four to six.


Advance preparation: Ribollita will stiffen up considerably if you make it too far in advance. If you do so, thin it out as desired with water or stock and adjust salt.


Nutritional information per serving (four servings): 407 calories; 2 grams saturated fat; 1 gram polyunsaturated fat; 7 grams monounsaturated fat; 0 milligrams cholesterol; 63 grams carbohydrates; 17 grams dietary fiber; 610 milligrams sodium (does not include salt to taste); 16 grams protein


Nutritional information per serving (six servings): 271 calories; 1 gram saturated fat; 1 gram polyunsaturated fat; 5 grams monounsaturated fat; 0 milligrams cholesterol; 42 grams carbohydrates; 11 grams dietary fiber; 407 milligrams sodium (does not include salt to taste); 10 grams protein


Martha Rose Shulman is the author of "The Very Best of Recipes for Health."


 

2011年4月20日星期三

Allan Blakeney, Pioneer of Canadian Health Care, Dies at 85

The Saskatchewan government said the cause was liver cancer.


In 1946, the government of Tommy Douglas, then Saskatchewan’s premier, enacted universal insurance coverage for hospitalization. Mr. Douglas’s successor, Woodrow Lloyd expanded the program in 1962 to include the costs of medical care provided by doctors.


Nine out of 10 doctors responded by going on strike, people demonstrated in support of the doctors and newspapers editorialized in their favor. Mr. Blakeney, as the health minister in Mr. Lloyd’s government, became the main negotiator with the physicians. He succeeded in keeping the new system — partly by emphasizing its lower cost — but compromised to give doctors the right to charge fees for services, rather than going on salary.


Mr. Blakeney later called the brouhaha the “the greatest social conflict I was involved in.” By 1966, universal medical coverage had been extended to all Canadians. Opposition to the plan in Saskatchewan, however, helped the Liberal Party defeat Mr. Lloyd’s government in 1964.


Mr. Blakeney remained a member of the provincial legislature and practiced law. But by 1970, he had become leader of the provincial New Democratic Party, and he led it to victory the next year.


As Saskatchewan’s premier, a post he held until 1982, he put into effect a flurry of programs he called a New Deal for People. These included a dental program for children, a prescription drug program, subsidized housing, home care and a guaranteed income supplement for the elderly poor. He helped pass a law to allow the government to purchase land from older farmers, so it in turn could rent the land to their children, making it financially feasible for them to stay on the family homestead.


Mr. Blakeney aggressively increased the fees charged by the province for mining potash, a component of fertilizer. After foreign producers, largely American, refused to pay, Mr. Blakeney’s government seized the mines of companies producing more than 40 percent of the province’s potash, paying what it said was a fair market price. Both the companies and the United States government protested, but the action stood.


Mr. Blakeney also became a force on the national scene during the discussions over Canada’s new Constitution in the early 1980s. He successfully argued for more power for provincial legislatures.


Allan Emrys Blakeney was born on Sept. 7, 1925, in Bridgewater, Nova Scotia, and grew up dreaming of being a sea captain. He earned a law degree from Dalhousie University in Halifax, then studied at Oxford as a Rhodes scholar, earning a bachelor’s degree in politics, philosophy and economics. He worked as a civil servant in the Saskatchewan government until he was elected to the provincial legislature in 1960. In addition to being provincial health minister, he was also minister of education and treasurer.


He ran unsuccessfully to return to the premier’s job in 1986, then retired from politics two years later. Mr. Blakeney’s first wife, the former Molly Schwartz, died in 1957. His survivors include his wife, the former Anne Gorham, and four children.


Mr. Blakeney watched the United States’ debate on health care, which resulted in the Affordable Health Care for America Act of 2009, with keen interest. He called the American

2011年4月17日星期日

Personal Health: Keeping Eyes on Distracted Driving’s Toll

? Reprogrammed your GPS device?


? Retrieved something you or a child dropped?


? Searched for a particular CD?


? Put on makeup or shaved?


? Struggled to open a package of nuts or chips?


Perhaps you never have texted or talked on a cellphone while operating a motor vehicle. But if you engaged in any of the above activities, you are just as guilty of distracted driving as if you had.


It’s easy to become complacent. Maybe you’re a good driver, and you’ve gotten away with such actions for years. Maybe you managed to avert a near-accident when your attention returned to the road in the nick of time. But one of these days, your luck may run out and you, or someone you hit, could be maimed for life or dead.


“Driving while distracted is roughly equivalent to driving drunk,” Dr. Amy N. Ship, an internist at Harvard Medical School, wrote last year in a commentary in The New England Journal of Medicine. “Any activity that distracts a driver visually or cognitively increases the risk of an accident. None of them is safe.”


Following widespread publicity about the hazards of distracted driving, including a Pulitzer-prize winning series in this newspaper, medical groups are working hard to make patients more aware of the problem. The most recent effort was started last week by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Orthopaedic Trauma Association, whose “Decide to Drive” campaign calls attention to the increasing number of distractions engaged in by multitasking drivers and the resulting toll on people’s lives.


“We take care of a lot of people injured in car accidents, and distracted driving is a substantial contributor to these accidents,” Dr. Daniel Berry, president of the academy, said in an interview. “If we could get rid of this part of our practice, it would be a great service to the people we care for.”


Orthopedists would do very well, thank you, without the business generated by the 307,369 crashes that have occurred so far this year, according to estimates from the National Safety Council, involving drivers talking on cellphones or texting.


Last year Aaron Brookens of Beloit, Wis., then 19, was driving home at 75 miles an hour after spending a weekend with his girlfriend when he decided to send her a text message — and wound up pinned under a semi. The toll: two broken femurs, a broken kneecap and ankle, nerve damage to both legs, and a lacerated spleen, kidney and liver.


Numerous operations and a lengthy rehab later, Mr. Brookens knows he’s lucky to be alive. “No one thinks it will happen to them,” he said on Wednesday at a news conference convened by the orthopedists. He now realizes that “deciding to drive” is always the best option, and he wants others to learn from his mistake.


“We don’t expect our campaign to change everyone’s behavior overnight,” Dr. Berry said. “It took a lot of years to get the message across about using seat belts or driving drunk. We’re adding our voice to those of others — the more jungle drums, the better.”


Among those beating the drums are the parents of Eric Okerblom, a 19-year-old college student who was struck by a car and killed in 2009 while cycling near his home in Santa Maria, Calif.; the driver, a teenager, was traveling 60 m.p.h. while texting on her cellphone. His father, Bob Okerblom, is now on a cross-country bike ride, blogging along the way in order to spread the word about distracted driving.


Last November, the transportation secretary, Ray LaHood, introduced a Web site called “Faces of Distracted Driving” (distraction.gov/faces) that explores the cost these behaviors inflict on families and communities. “Distracted driving has become a deadly epidemic on America’s roads,” said Mr. LaHood, who urges bans on drivers texting and using phones or other devices.


At the news briefing, Dr. Andrew Pollak, president of the trauma association, said: “It isn’t just cellphones. It’s anything that takes our attention from the task of driving.”


David L. Strickland, administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, added: “No one does multitasking well.”


The orthopedists’ campaign will try to raise the national consciousness and change future driving behavior by taking their message to schoolchildren, especially those in grades 5 through 8, who may discourage their parents and siblings from driving distracted and refrain themselves when they become drivers.


Statistics and Studies


 

2011年4月16日星期六

Well: Hypnosis as a Health Option

Peter DaSilva for The New York Times Dr. David Spiegel of Stanford University School of Medicine call hypnosis an “effective and inexpensive way to manage medical care.”

Today’s Patient Money column looks into the costs and potential benefits of hypnosis for dealing with anxiety, pain management and other health issues.



Some critics find the research into mind-body therapies unconvincing, but their skepticism has not deterred patients. And there are researchers who say they believe that by helping patients feel in better control of their symptoms, hypnosis can reduce the need for medication and lower costs.


“It is an effective and inexpensive way to manage medical care,” said Dr. David Spiegel, director of the Center on Stress and Health at Stanford University School of Medicine and a leading authority on hypnosis.


A study by radiologists at Harvard Medical School, published in 2000, found that patients who received hypnosis during surgery required less medication, had fewer complications and shorter procedures than patients who did not have hypnosis. In a follow-up study in 2002, the radiologists concluded that if every patient undergoing catheterization were to receive hypnosis, the cost savings would amount to $338 per patient.


To learn more, read the full column, “Using Hypnosis to Take Control of Your Symptoms,” and then join the discussion below.