显示标签为“Administration”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“Administration”的博文。显示所有博文

2011年5月1日星期日

In Search for F.B.I. Director, Administration Seeks a Shared Philosophy

Robert S. Mueller III, who became the F.B.I. director just a week before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, will complete his 10-year term on Sept. 4, having led the in-progress effort to transform the bureau into a domestic intelligence agency.


A small team led by Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. has been evaluating potential successors and, according to officials familiar with the deliberations, has reached certain views about the ideal candidate.


In particular, officials said, the administration wants someone who shares the philosophy and has the management abilities to press forward with changing the bureau’s culture, so that agents focus less on solving already-completed crimes and more on uncovering potential threats — even at the expense of accumulating arrests and convictions.


Possible contenders include James B. Comey, a former deputy attorney general; Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the United States attorney in Chicago; Raymond W. Kelly, the New York City police commissioner; Ronald K. Noble, a former enforcement head at the Treasury Department who now leads Interpol; and Kenneth L. Wainstein, a former assistant attorney general for national security.


Officials say the administration is also looking for someone who will be easily confirmed and who will be respected both inside the bureau and elsewhere in the intelligence community.


Finally, they say, they want someone with the character to be a strong leader during a crisis and to maintain an appropriate level of independence, but who would keep a low political profile and focus on operational matters while deferring to the White House and the Justice Department on policy issues.


In many ways the administration appears to be looking for a clone of Mr. Mueller, who worked relatively smoothly with four attorneys general of widely divergent personalities and political views, under both a Republican and a Democratic president.


“Bob is a hard person to replace,” Mr. Holder told reporters last week. “He has done a really excellent job in transforming the F.B.I. He is a person who has the confidence of the people in the F.B.I. and people in the intelligence community. He’s a person I’ve worked with for a number of years — he’s a friend. He has the president’s confidence as well. So we want to make sure the person picked to be his successor will be able to fill those really large shoes that he leaves.”


Mr. Holder said the administration wanted to have the next director in place by the time Mr. Mueller is required to step down. He hinted that a nomination could come as early as May, though other officials said that later was more likely. The Senate has been slow to vote on Justice Department nominees lately; by contrast, in 2001, the Senate confirmed Mr. Mueller less than a month after his nomination.


It is not clear whether there is a front-runner for the job.


Most of the high-profile potential nominees come with advantages and disadvantages.


Mr. Comey, a career prosecutor who was the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York before his elevation to deputy attorney general, earned a reputation for independence by leading — with Mr. Mueller at his side — an internal Bush administration revolt in March 2004 over the legality of the program of surveillance without warrants, forcing the White House to modify the program.


Mr. Comey is now identified as a Republican political appointee, which could make it easier for him to win confirmation, but the Obama administration might also be reluctant to signal that it could not find a Democrat for the job. Mr. Comey also now has a well-paying job at Lockheed Martin and may be reluctant to leave it.


Mr. Fitzgerald, a longtime prosecutor and a holdover United States attorney from the Bush administration, also has a strong reputation for independence, as leader of the investigation into the leak of the name of a Central Intelligence Agency operative, Valerie Plame Wilson.


Like Mr. Comey, Mr. Fitzgerald now has the public identity of a Republican political appointee. Moreover, his demonstrated willingness to challenge the Bush White House could give its current occupants pause, though they would never say so in public.


Mr. Kelly, by contrast, is a Democrat with a strong law enforcement résumé. Before becoming commissioner of the New York Police Department, he was a Treasury Department official during the Clinton administration and supervised the United States Customs Service, the Secret Service and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, has endorsed him for the F.B.I. position.


But Mr. Kelly would be 70 at the start of his 10-year term. In addition, his efforts to expand the Police Department’s counterterrorism intelligence-gathering capabilities have led to turf-war friction with F.B.I. officials. He also helped scuttle Mr. Holder’s signature plan to prosecute the Sept. 11 defendants in Manhattan.


Mr. Noble, too, is a Democrat who oversaw the Treasury Department’s enforcement arm for a period during the Clinton administration. He has global stature as the first American to be elected to lead Interpol, developing ties that would resonate with the F.B.I.’s increasing presence overseas. But he has less operational experience than other candidates and is somewhat less well-known in Washington.


Mr. Wainstein is the candidate most closely associated with Mr. Mueller, whom he worked with first as the F.B.I. general counsel and then as his chief of staff. Later, Mr. Wainstein became the United States attorney for the District of Columbia, then led the Justice Department’s national security division. Since leaving the department, he has frequently testified before Congress about national security legal policy issues. Like Mr. Comey and Mr. Fitzgerald, Mr. Wainstein is now identified as a Republican appointee — though he, too, was a longtime federal prosecutor and is generally respected on both sides of the aisle.


At least two prominent figures are said to have made it clear that they do not want to be considered for the job, including Merrick B. Garland, a federal appeals court judge, and Jamie Gorelick, a former deputy attorney general and a member of the Sept. 11 commission.


 

2011年4月8日星期五

Work Smarter, Not Harder: Tips for Linux Administration Done Right

Interrupt driven. That's how a lot of sysadmins define their jobs, and it's absolutely true. We spend a good portion of every day running from problem to problem. Whether it be a user who can't get their email, to a jammed printer, to a server that's got a failed disk, we friendly neighborhood system administrators have plenty to do on a daily basis. However, we're also some of the most resourceful people in any given organization. It's time we used that resourcefulness to make our lives easier. I'm going to run through some techniques and ways of thinking that will help you better manage your workload and increase the overall quality of the services you provide to your organization.


Here are a few values that my techniques are built on. They may seem basic, but it's amazing how you can lose sight of the larger picture and your value to the organization when you're playing fireman. It's difficult to think strategically if you are acting tactically all the time.

You want to do as little of this as you can get away with. The job is difficult enough, so figure out ways to make your life easier.

Good Tools? are like gold.

Build them, download them, or buy them — they are worth it!

If you have to work, its better to do prep work up front than panic work.

Panic work will take years off your life, tick off your loved ones, and make you grumpy. Avoid it. Be prepared, like a Boy Scout.

Reuse, Recycle, Reduce.

Leverage work done before you. Use other code, or pieces from projects. Don't reinvent the wheel. Document your work.

Think, think, think.

It wouldn't be called "Working Smarter" if you didn't think. So do that.

Hardware is the foundation of what we do as system administrators, so it behooves you to ensure your hardware is up to task. We've all got systems we've inherited, or systems that are old and dying that are under our care. If you don't like a particular system, or it's got issues, quit grumbling about it, get it off the back burner, and fix the darn thing. A system that needs constant hand-holding doesn't do your organization any favors. Here are a few other hardware-related tips that help out a bunch:

Goes by iLO if you're using an HP server, or DRAC if you're using a Dell, or LOM if you're on a Sun. This lets you connect remotely to your server and get a console on it, or power cycle it, or do remote diagnostics. It's invaluable. Insist that all your servers have this. HP servers include it by default.If you can't get a server with iLO, you can fake it. Remote console servers like a Cyclades unit will get you a serial text console on a given server, and a remote power strip like a BayTech or APC unit can get you the ability to power cycle a machine. Alternatively, you can build your own using an old computer and some X10 gear like I did at home — though I don't recommend this for your business!

RAID

Not the bug spray, but a Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks. Your servers should all have RAID-1 (a pair of disks, mirrored) at a minimum, unless you're doing something like Hadoop. This protects against a disk failure, and will save you time by not having to rebuild a system if a disk fails.

Redundancy

From redundant power supplies, to redundant network interface cards using ethernet bonding — no one ever got fired for making something too redundant.

Virtualization and the Cloud

Don't be afraid of virtualization or the cloud. If your application can tolerate being migrated to a virtual machine or offloaded to a cloud provider, seriously consider it. You may wind up saving a lot of hardware-related headache.Virtualization and the cloud are not "one-size-fits-all" solutions, however. Use good judgement and be sure to run many pilot tests before deploying your application on these platforms.

By making the best use of hardware, you'll be able to focus more on the services you're providing rather than dealing with hardware failures — or having to drive to the data center at 2 a.m.




View the original article here