显示标签为“hints”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“hints”的博文。显示所有博文

2011年5月16日星期一

As Libya Buries Victims, Hints of Deception

Then, in minutes, the few hundred mourners who had gathered in this city melted away into a perfect spring day, ending another funeral — this time for the victims of a Friday bombing in the eastern oil town of Brega — that had been transformed into a pageant for denouncing the NATO forces whose bombs are taking a regular toll in Libyan lives.


For the officials who shepherd the small band of foreign journalists covering the war from here to such events, seeing them as powerful propaganda tools to be used against the Western powers, the burials on Saturday provided a moment that even the most accomplished propagandists could not have written into their script.


Just before the coffins arrived, two high-flying aircraft — NATO planes, for sure, since others are banned under a United Nations-imposed no-fly zone — wrote vapor trails high above.


As one aircraft circled back to the northeast, another flew on to the southwest, toward the western mountains along the Tunisian and Algerian borders where there has been intense fighting between Libyan rebels and the forces of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi. At the sight of each aircraft, mourners pointed in agitation to the sky, demanding that foreign TV crews capture the moment and shouting choruses of support for Colonel Qaddafi.


The moment captured the anger and futility felt by Libyans still loyal to Colonel Qaddafi as NATO aircraft pound targets in Tripoli and other government-held areas night after night, day after day, with the total of sorties flown since the air raids began now cresting 2,500.


Western defense officials have said that 40 to 50 percent of the Qaddafi forces’ striking power has been degraded, and with it almost all the capability, in fighter aircraft, missiles and antiaircraft batteries, that Libya had to confront an aerial invader. So far, only one NATO plane has crashed, and that was early in the conflict, after what NATO officials said was a technical failure.


If the funeral on Saturday was planned as a moment to strike a moral blow against the West, it was only modestly successful. Other messages pressed in.


The cemetery chosen for the burials was not one of the city’s most prestigious, but one set on a windblown stretch of shoreline across from a bleak highway overpass. A mile or two to the west, the idle cranes of the Tripoli port and the anchored ships stood like sentinels, testament to an oil-based economy that has been paralyzed by the war.


The 10-minute bus ride from the journalists’ hotel passed by several of the long lines for fuel that are a telltale feature wherever the government still holds sway. Dwarfing the lines in Baghdad in the final months of Saddam Hussein’s rule, the ones here run for miles, often four lines abreast, sometimes with more than one snaking corridor of vehicles approaching a single gas station. The waits can last days, a week even, and they have added to an air of demoralization that weighs even on officials appointed to mind foreign reporters.


Against this background, the funeral promised a powerful counterpoint, one with the potential to rally faint hearts. On Friday, officials gathered reporters at a Tripoli mosque to announce that 11 Muslim clerics had been killed in a NATO strike at Brega, 500 miles east of Tripoli, and the government’s easternmost point of control. The officials said 45 others had been wounded in the bombing of a former oil company guesthouse, and gave the platform to a cleric who called for the dead to be avenged in terrorist attacks against the West.


Earlier in the week, the propaganda apparatus had been focused on a gathering of tribal leaders in support of Colonel Qaddafi. Now, the deaths of the imams appeared to lay the ground for marshaling an even wider body of opinion. Calling the NATO attackers “crusaders” set the tone, as did the assertion, common in all the bombings, that NATO was lying when it identified the Brega target as a “command-and-control” center for pro-Qaddafi forces.


But the funeral itself seemed strangely flat, at least in political terms. For one thing, despite the location being broadcast on Libyan state television, and circulated in cellphone text messages, barely 500 people showed up, in a city of two million. No important government officials attended. For all the browbeating directed at foreign reporters by mourners who vowed their love for Colonel Qaddafi and their hatred for NATO, the event, taken as a whole, seemed underwhelming.


Part of the problem lay in the contradictions and uncertainties that flowed from official accounts, and those given by the mourners.


According to officials, the nine coffins, with bodies wrapped in the green of Islam, were those of the dead Muslim clerics. But some mourners offered differing counts. Two men whispered that their uncles, among those being buried, were soldiers, and one of those said the man concerned had been dead for weeks. Another identified one of the dead as a driver.


There was a man who said that he was in the guesthouse when it was attacked, and that 7 of the group of 16 he had led to the Brega gathering from Sirte, Colonel Qaddafi’s hometown, had been killed, 4 of them imams. The man, who identified himself as Attiya Ali Ahmed, 25, appeared to have suffered no injury in the attack. He said that the gathering had been called for a public reading of the Koran and to rally morale in Brega against the rebels, and that he had seen no sign of any military activity in or near the guesthouse. And he warned reporters to accurately convey his account.


“The Koran does not permit anything but the truth,” he said.


 

2011年4月23日星期六

In Media’s Wedding Frenzy, Hints of Viewer Fatigue

The latest New York Times/CBS News poll, of 1,224 Americans, has found that only 6 percent of respondents have been following news about the wedding “very closely,” and another 22 percent “somewhat closely.”


Though a third of women under age 40, and 4 in 10 of those 40 and up, said they were keeping track of events, half of the male respondents said they were not following the buildup at all.


Anchors, reporters and support staff from American networks and cable news channels are already arriving here. And in the days leading up to the wedding, Buckingham Palace has promised to keep its floodlights on an hour later, until midnight, so that the palace can be used as backdrop for live news reports by broadcast networks in the United States.


But those networks are remaining tight-lipped about how extensive their coverage will be. CBS and NBC said they did not discuss staffing decisions; ABC did not respond to messages.


But three employees at NBC News, who spoke anonymously out of concern for their jobs, said that NBC and MSNBC would have about 200 people involved in covering the wedding. The large numbers were prompted, suggested one, by “the thinking that it’s a happy, fairy-tale story — and America needs happy stories right now.”


Some Americans, though, rejected that idea when contacted for a follow-up interview after The Times/CBS poll.


“It’s their British thing, it’s their custom,” said Edward Rakas, 57, of Colchester, Conn. “I guess they enjoy it, but it’s just not something I’m interested in.”


Even in Britain, where hundreds of thousands are expected to fill London on the wedding day, a significant number — about 47 percent in a telephone poll conducted by Ipsos MORI last week — said they had little or no interest in the proceedings.


Some of that might be attributed to the contrast of a wedding steeped in centuries of opulent privilege with sweeping spending cuts that the government says are necessary to tame Britain’s deficit.


When it was announced in November that Prince William was engaged to Miss Middleton, one reader of The Daily Mail, which is usually staunchly royalist, commented, tongue in cheek, that the princess-to-be “has been largely unemployed since she left school and is now marrying someone who has been on welfare most of his life.” With cuts to state benefits inevitable, the reader went on, “I do worry for them.”


And in contrast to the ranks of earnest souvenirs that now fill London’s tourist shops, disaffected Britons can also buy royal wedding airsickness bags.


Lydia Leith, the graphic designer behind the bags, said in an interview on Friday that she was inspired to make them after conversations with people who said they were “sick of the royal wedding.”


She estimates that she has sold about 8,000 since February, adding, “I haven’t really had time to count because I am just about keeping up with orders.” Large quantities have been bought, she said, for anti-wedding parties that will be taking place around the country on Friday.


Many of those parties were organized by Republic, a group that has campaigned for the abolition of the monarchy since 1983, according to Graham Smith, its executive officer. “We’ve seen roughly a doubling of our numbers since the engagement was announced in November,” he said, “to about 14,000.”


Mr. Smith hopes that the wedding will help rally others sympathetic to his cause; the MORI poll showed that 18 percent of Britons would like to see the end of the monarchy.


“While we’re all tightening our belts,” he said, “they are helping themselves to our tax money for a big wedding.”


The American media, said Fred M. Leventhal, emeritus professor of British history at Boston University, “does not have to worry about constitutional or financial elements.”


Instead, he said, “It’s fascinated with things royal partly because they’re different from what we have. The glamour that attaches itself to some presidents, like Kennedy and to a lesser extent Obama, is politicized, and many people don’t go along with it. The royal family are exotic, and they’re free from all those conflicted political questions.”


But when British royals toured the United States in 1939, he said, “they deliberately did not include most of the Midwest, because they felt there was general indifference.”


More than 70 years later, he said, “it seems likely there will be large parts of the country that are indifferent this time, too.”


Marjorie Connelly contributed reporting.


 

2011年4月15日星期五

TiVo survey hints at multiroom companion box, four tuner DVR in the future

There were mainly two questions. The first wanted a numerical rating from 0 to 100 for two options. The only stipulation was that the total of the two ratings summed to 100.

(1) A companion device for your DVR. It allows a second TV (in another room) to watch live TV (in HD) and also watch the recordings from your DVR.
(2) A 4-tuner high-definition DVR that allows you to record up to 4 shows at one time (and watch a 5th show that is previously recorded).


The second question provided a more extensive list of features which we were to choose those we thought interesting. Again, from that subset, we were to provide numerical ratings that summed to 100.


(1) Sort your recordings by season and episode number. For example, if you recorded 20 episodes of The Simpsons on your DVR, this feature would allow you to browse and watch them from earliest season to latest.


(2) Mark on demand movies you want to watch in the future. Come back to that list later, when you are ready to watch and see all the movies you previously marked.


(3) For channels you receive in HD, automatically hide the standard definition versions from the onscreen program guide.


(4) When searching for a movie or show, if it isn't available to watch or record now, have an option to save this search and automatically record it if it becomes available in the future.


(5) Customize a list of shortcuts to your favorite tasks (such as: go to the Search feature, go to Netflix Instant) and access it using a dedicated button on the remote control.


(6) Ability to watch recorded TV shows and movies from any connected DVR in your home, without having to copy the show to the DVR you are using.


(7) From any one DVR in your home, view a single, integrated list of *all* the TV shows and movies that have been recorded on any DVR in the home.


(8) When searching for a specific TV show or movie, if it is not available from a channel or video provider I currently get, list other ways I could get it, such as subscribing to a premium channel or signing up for a different video provider (Netflix, Hulu)


(9) When a conflict prevents a show from being scheduled, suggest another DVR in the home that is available to record it.


(10) Find and record upcoming sporting events by specific league or team.


(11) When browsing the onscreen program guide, see at a glance what programs the DVR recommends for you based on shows and actors you have enjoyed in the past.


(12) Organize and view your recorded shows in different ways (to include: shows you already started watching, all sports together, all movies together).


(13) Ability to see a list of live TV shows and movies that are: playing now, available on favorite channels, popular, liked by friends, or new.


(14) When looking for a movie or show to watch, see the available programs ordered by time: What is free & on right now, from on demand, or can be recorded later this week.


(15) When setting up recordings, display *all* conflicting programs and choose exactly which programs to record and which to skip.


(16) Set up a recording for specific seasons of a TV show, instead of all episodes (e.g. record only Season 1 of Lost).


(17) Customize a list of shortcuts to your favorite tasks (such as: go to the Search feature, go to Netflix Instant) and access it from the DVR's main screen.


(18) In the onscreen program guide, group channels affiliated with the same network (NBC, HBO, etc.) together in the guide, even if they have widely separated channel numbers.


(19) Record every episode of a TV show on every channel that it appears on.


(20) View a 3-line "mini Guide" while watching live TV, displaying 3 channels of program guide information at a time, so that more of the show you are watching is visible.


(21) Use search to find a particular station (like HBO, NBC or ESPN). Selecting a channel from the results takes you directly to live TV for that channel.