显示标签为“Threats”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“Threats”的博文。显示所有博文

2011年4月27日星期三

Text Messages Proliferate as Threats in Iraq

What Dr. Abdellah did not anticipate, though, was a barrage of one of this country’s more peculiar menaces: death threats by text message.


“I’ve been getting heaps of them,” he said recently in an interview in Baghdad, where he had fled to from the north after several kidnapping attempts. “Every single day.”


He estimated that he had received nearly 300 such threats since late February. They usually read, he said, “We are going to kill that, or we are going to burn that. Very rude language.”


One of the few that can be printed read, “If you come back to Erbil you will not see the blue sky again.”


Digital media have amplified the young voices of democracy ringing around the Middle East, but the flip side here is that the authorities and insurgents alike are also adept at using technology, particularly cellphones, largely unavailable here before the 2003 American invasion, as part of their arsenals of intimidation.


Actual violence may have declined substantially since the worst days of the war, but a culture of fear and intimidation still prevails. It has been on display during the intermittent protests that have rippled across Iraq in the wake of the regional uprisings. Death threats delivered by text message have become such a common experience across the spectrum of Iraq’s public-minded professions — lawyers, journalists, activists and government officials — that the two mobile phone companies, Zain and Asia Cell, have arrangements with the police and courts to investigate them.


“There is a great deal of cooperation between the security forces, the Iraqi judiciary and Zain with exchanging information,” said Mazin al-Asadi, a representative for Zain.


Yet most of the threats are untraceable, having been sent from throw-away phones and SIM cards bought on the black market.


“It’s impossible to count them,” said Abed al-Sattar al-Bairaqdar, the spokesman for Iraq’s Supreme Court.


Interviews with Iraqis suggest that the phenomenon cuts across all strata of society, but journalists in particular have been subject to such tactics, especially during the protests. And recent reports from Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International about abuses by security forces have mentioned text-messaged death threats.


“It’s something we’ve noticed for a while now, and it’s pervasive throughout Iraq,” said Samer Muscati, a Middle East researcher for Human Rights Watch who has recently visited Iraq. “But it seems it’s getting worse. Just about every protest organizer we’ve spoken with, and journalists, too, are getting these threats by phone and text.”


Mr. Muscati said it was common for journalists in Iraq to appear on television speaking about a controversial subject like corruption, and then, after the show, “they are barraged by these messages.”


Amnesty International, for example, reported that numerous journalists in the Kurdish region had received such messages, which the organization believes came from security officials who have taken part in attacks on news organizations. One, a correspondent for the satellite television channel KNN, affiliated with the Kurdish opposition party Goran, received a text message after reporting on work that Amnesty International has been doing in Iraq. The message told the reporter to stop his work. “Otherwise, the outcome will be disastrous,” the message read.


In the case of Dr. Abdellah, Kair al-Dain, the deputy police chief in Erbil, said he was aware of the doctor’s claims, but he would not comment more beyond saying that he had “no idea” whether Dr. Abdellah had indeed received intimidating messages.


The messages come in three basic varieties. Some are meant to intimidate, as in the case of Dr. Abdellah, who suspects that they came from the security officials who confiscated his cellphone when he was briefly imprisoned.


“They are very advanced in technology,” Dr. Abdellah said. “When you try to call the numbers, they are just disconnected.”


Yassir al-Jubori, 28, a journalist in Diyala, received a text message in February that read, “Your tongue has become too big, and it is time to cut it off.” He was told to quit his job.


“I remained for a few days in my house to be away from the insurgents,” Mr. Jubori said. “Day by day I got used to it and resumed my job, because I believe in fate.”


Other messages are mechanisms of blackmail and part of the kidnapping-for-ransom business that thrives here. Several of those interviewed said they received messages demanding payments to stay alive. One businessman in Kirkuk, who said he was kidnapped two years ago by the Sunni insurgent group Ansar al-Sunna because he had worked with the American military, recently received a text threat by the same group demanding $50,000.


“I didn’t pay them because the security situation has gotten better,” said the businessman, Faisal Hassan Khalaf. But he said he did not disregard the threat entirely. “I had to move away and change my vehicles because they can kill me whenever they want to. But at the same time, I can’t keep paying ransoms.”


At other times, the messages are tools of sectarian aggression.


Muhammed Abdul Naser, a 25-year-old student in Adhamiya, a Sunni neighborhood of Baghdad, once received a text that read: “We are the killers from the Mahdi Army. We know that you live close to the fish market. We will get you. We will get you.”


In one of the few instances in which the interviewees said the message was successfully traced, Mr. Naser said the cellphone company was able to locate the sender, who he said was indeed a member of the Mahdi Army, the now-disbanded Shiite militia loyal to the radical cleric Moktada al-Sadr.


“I knew some people that were with the Mahdi Army,” Mr. Naser said, “and they went to him and asked him to leave me alone.”


In recent days, Dr. Abdellah said the Kurdish authorities demanded three things of him: that he stay off Facebook, refrain from news media interviews and leave Erbil.


He agreed only to the final demand — to protect his family members who live in Erbil — and spoke recently at a cafe in Baghdad on the evening before he left the country. He had just gotten a new cellphone, and was enjoying a respite from the steady flow of menacing words.


Dr. Abdellah said he was leaving the country for only a few weeks. “I’m not going to give up,” he said.


Omar al-Jawoshy contributed reporting from Baghdad, and employees of The New York Times from Baghdad, Kirkuk and Diyala, Iraq.


 

2011年4月21日星期四

For Threats of Terrorism, Two Words Will Warn

 

The color-coded threat level system endured for nearly 10 years despite widespread criticism, if not mockery, of its sometimes perplexing messages to the public. Now the Department of Homeland Security is phasing out the green-blue-yellow-orange-red palette in favor of a system that officials say will convey more information about the threats.


“Say goodbye to orange,” Janet Napolitano, the homeland security secretary, said Wednesday in announcing the replacement system at Grand Central Terminal in New York.


Ms. Napolitano said the new program, called the national terrorism advisory system, would be put into operation Tuesday. “Elevated” alerts will warn of credible terrorism threats; “imminent” will warn of credible, specific and impending terrorism threats.


The alerts will be “based on specific, credible information about potential terrorist activity” and will include “as many details as we can provide in an unclassified form,” Ms. Napolitano said. They will include a concise summary of a potential threat, a description of the area or type of transportation that could be affected, information about steps the authorities are taking to address any threat and suggestions on how people can be prepared and stay informed.


The alerts will be disseminated through announcements to news organizations and social media sites and will appear on a new Web site, www.dhs.gov/alert.


To avoid a series of “cascading alerts” that can confuse the public, Ms. Napolitano said, each alert issued will expire after two weeks, unless intelligence agencies and the homeland security secretary decide otherwise.


Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, a New York Democrat who joined Ms. Napolitano at the news conference Wednesday, said she thought the public had become inured to the color-coded system, “which many people had basically tuned out because it never ended, and you didn’t really know what it meant.”


Ms. Napolitano said that the new system would provide more concrete information to the public and that alerts under the new system would rely on more specific indications of danger.


The color-coded system was established by a presidential directive in March 2002 during the administration of George W. Bush and denoted five threat levels with a range of colors from green (low) to red (severe).


Nearly from the beginning, the system was maligned as being too vague. The fact that alerts were rarely accompanied by any specific explanation led some people to wonder whether they were sometimes used for political purposes.


“It really didn’t make people more aware or less aware,” said Jim Parker, 46, a lawyer from the Upper West Side of Manhattan who was waiting for a train in the Union Square subway station. “It seemed like the government was putting on a show.”


Edward Mackel, 28, a building supplies salesman from Sunnyside, Queens, said he preferred a system that included information about the nature of a potential threat.


“You walk into an airport,” he said. “You see there’s an orange alert and of course you want to know why.”