显示标签为“Fixes”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“Fixes”的博文。显示所有博文

2011年5月8日星期日

Ministers Meet to Study Fixes on Greek Debt

After the private gathering, the prime minister of Luxembourg, Jean-Claude Juncker, who heads the group of euro-area finance ministers, said that Greece’s financial assistance program “does need a further adjustment” and that it would be discussed at the group’s next meeting on May 16.


Mr. Juncker told reporters that European Union officials were “excluding the restructuring option which is discussed heavily in certain quarters of the financial markets,” according to Bloomberg News.


France, Germany, Italy and Spain were represented at the meeting in Luxembourg, which also included the president of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, and Olli Rehn, the European commissioner for economic and monetary affairs, Mr. Juncker said.


A spokesman for the Greek finance ministry did not respond to questions about the nature of the talks.


But after an evening of intense speculation, Athens confirmed in a statement that its finance minister, George Papaconstantinou, attended the meeting and discussed the country’s economic predicament. “The minister was invited to exchange views” including economic developments in Greece, the statement said, denying an online report by Der Spiegel of Germany that Greece might leave the euro zone. That report caused a sharp drop in the euro, which fell to $1.4337 in New York, from $1.4530 late Thursday.


“It is clear that during this meeting it was never discussed or posed as an issue whether Greece would remain in the euro zone,” the statement said, according to Reuters.


That Mr. Papaconstantinou traveled to Luxembourg for these discussions suggested that Greece might finally be prepared to concede what analysts have been arguing for more than a year: that Greece’s debt, which is expected to exceed 150 percent of gross domestic product in the coming years, is unsustainable.


So far, Greek and European officials have said consistently that a debt restructuring that would cause bondholders to suffer a haircut, or a loss on their holdings, was out of the question. But that stance may not preclude a softer option in which bondholders might be persuaded to exchange their shorter maturity debt for securities with longer maturities and perhaps even a lower interest rate.


The majority of the bondholders are French, German and Greek banks, as well as the European Central Bank.


Referred to as a reprofiling, this softer approach was used successfully in Uruguay in 2003 and for weeks now has been a hot topic for discussion among policy makers in Europe as well as economists and analysts at investment banks.


A reprofiling would allow bondholders to avoid the stark losses they would face under a restructuring and would also give breathing room to Greece to generate enough cash to begin paying its debts.


Detractors say that such a solution, while appropriate for Uruguay, which suffered from a liquidity crisis, does not go far enough in the case of Greece, which is confronting a huge debt burden.


Policy makers at the European Central Bank are convinced that a Greek default would quickly undermine confidence elsewhere in the euro area and raise borrowing cost for other countries like Portugal and Ireland. It was also not clear what Greece would gain from such a move because its banks would fail and it would be years before the country could borrow internationally again.


Asked about default speculation at a news conference on Thursday, Mr. Trichet said, “It is not in the cards.”


The meeting in Luxembourg, made up of just a few ministers and senior officials, frustrated the euro zone nations not invited.


Without the status of a formal meeting, the gathering could not make any decisions, but smaller euro zone nations are sensitive about suggestions that the bigger nations are effectively deciding policy.


Jack Ewing contributed reporting from Frankfurt.


View the original article here

2011年5月7日星期六

Ministers Meet to Study Fixes on Greek Debt

After the private gathering, the prime minister of Luxembourg, Jean-Claude Juncker, who heads the group of euro-area finance ministers, said that Greece’s financial assistance program “does need a further adjustment” and that it would be discussed at the group’s next meeting on May 16.


Mr. Juncker told reporters that European Union officials were “excluding the restructuring option which is discussed heavily in certain quarters of the financial markets,” according to Bloomberg News.


France, Germany, Italy and Spain were represented at the meeting in Luxembourg, which also included the president of the European Central Bank, Jean-Claude Trichet, and Olli Rehn, the European commissioner for economic and monetary affairs, Mr. Juncker said.


A spokesman for the Greek finance ministry did not respond to questions about the nature of the talks.


But after an evening of intense speculation, Athens confirmed in a statement that its finance minister, George Papaconstantinou, attended the meeting and discussed the country’s economic predicament. “The minister was invited to exchange views” including economic developments in Greece, the statement said, denying an online report by Der Spiegel of Germany that Greece might leave the euro zone. That report caused a sharp drop in the euro, which fell to $1.4337 in New York, from $1.4530 late Thursday.


“It is clear that during this meeting it was never discussed or posed as an issue whether Greece would remain in the euro zone,” the statement said, according to Reuters.


That Mr. Papaconstantinou traveled to Luxembourg for these discussions suggested that Greece might finally be prepared to concede what analysts have been arguing for more than a year: that Greece’s debt, which is expected to exceed 150 percent of gross domestic product in the coming years, is unsustainable.


So far, Greek and European officials have said consistently that a debt restructuring that would cause bondholders to suffer a haircut, or a loss on their holdings, was out of the question. But that stance may not preclude a softer option in which bondholders might be persuaded to exchange their shorter maturity debt for securities with longer maturities and perhaps even a lower interest rate.


The majority of the bondholders are French, German and Greek banks, as well as the European Central Bank.


Referred to as a reprofiling, this softer approach was used successfully in Uruguay in 2003 and for weeks now has been a hot topic for discussion among policy makers in Europe as well as economists and analysts at investment banks.


A reprofiling would allow bondholders to avoid the stark losses they would face under a restructuring and would also give breathing room to Greece to generate enough cash to begin paying its debts.


Detractors say that such a solution, while appropriate for Uruguay, which suffered from a liquidity crisis, does not go far enough in the case of Greece, which is confronting a huge debt burden.


Policy makers at the European Central Bank are convinced that a Greek default would quickly undermine confidence elsewhere in the euro area and raise borrowing cost for other countries like Portugal and Ireland. It was also not clear what Greece would gain from such a move because its banks would fail and it would be years before the country could borrow internationally again.


Asked about default speculation at a news conference on Thursday, Mr. Trichet said, “It is not in the cards.”


The meeting in Luxembourg, made up of just a few ministers and senior officials, frustrated the euro zone nations not invited.


Without the status of a formal meeting, the gathering could not make any decisions, but smaller euro zone nations are sensitive about suggestions that the bigger nations are effectively deciding policy.


Jack Ewing contributed reporting from Frankfurt.


View the original article here

Bits: Wall Street Journal Leak Site Works on Fixes

May 7, 12:29 a.m. | Updated Updating Qualys’s rating of SafeHouse’s encryption.


The Wall Street Journal on Thursday introduced SafeHouse, a Web site that takes a page from WikiLeaks by inviting whistleblowers to submit tips and documents. But within hours, security researchers were challenging the notion that the site was safe for leakers. And on Friday, The Journal said it was rushing through technical changes to address the problems.


According to the researchers, the way SafeHouse uses Web encryption technology known as HTTPS opens the site up for attacks, and is not rigorous enough for a site that handles highly sensitive communications. They also said they were troubled that SafeHouse used Adobe Flash for uploading documents, a technology that can help strip leakers of anonymity.


The problems were the subject of a barrage of messages on Twitter on Thursday afternoon by Jacob Appelbaum, a developer for the Tor Project, which provides tools for anonymous online communication used by dissidents, whistleblowers, journalists and others. Mr. Appelbaum was formerly associated with Wikileaks. “Pro-tip: if you’re going to create a document leaking website – have a clue!” he wrote.


The Journal said in an e-mailed statement that it was taking the issues raised “very seriously” and that it would end its use of Flash within 48 hours. “In addition, our system has been updated to limit the types of less secure connections it will accept,” it said.


SafeHouse’s terms of service encourage whistleblowers to improve their security by using tools like Tor that provide anonymity. However, both Mr. Appelbaum and Peter Eckersley, a senior staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights group, said Adobe Flash defeated? those tools.


Mr. Eckersley said the problem was with a Flash feature called Flash Socket Class, which would allow SafeHouse to discover a user’s real IP address, regardless of any anonymizing technologies that might be in use. As such, The Journal could identify people who upload documents, or be forced by the government to do so. News organizations like The Journal are accustomed to protecting sources, including from the government, but having the information could open it up to legal difficulties.


The E.F.F. said that it raised its concerns about Flash Socket Class in March 2010 with Adobe’s chief privacy officer, MeMe Rasmussen, and that the company said the issue would be hard to fix but that it would work on it. An Adobe spokeswoman was not immediately able to provide comment.


The way HTTPS is used by SafeHouse would not be problematic for an average Web site, said Ivan Ristic, director of engineering at Qualys and founder of a research effort called SSL Labs. However, it did not cover all the bases necessary to ensure that a user couldn’t be fooled into engaging in unencrypted communication.


Dan Kaminsky, chief scientist at the security firm DKH, said even major banks did not use the advanced technologies in question. Those technologies are “nice to have,” but can cause other problems, he said, and their absence does not make a site unsafe.


Mr. Ristic said it was also troubling that SafeHouse was using algorithms known as cipher suites that are not strong enough to ensure that recorded communications cannot be deciphered later if the key to them is somehow obtained.


On Friday afternoon, Qualys was giving SafeHouse a grade of B on its use of encryption, in large measure due to poor cipher strength. But by Friday evening, its use of cipher technology was getting higher marks, and Qualys raised its grade to an A.


“Hopefully we’ll see this WSJ site moving toward a truly secure deployment,” Mr. Eckersley of the E.F.F. said. “That kind of i-dotting and t-crossing is necessary to be safe against some of the attacks we’ve seen used against HTTPS Web sites in recent years.”


View the original article here